# GetAccept: products, MCP servers and connect URLs, one vendor page > GetAccept (getaccept.com): 1 product in The GTM MCP Directory, 0 with an official MCP server, 0 answering a live handshake, 0 tools catalogued. Data baked 2026-09-27. *Markdown twin of the HTML page at the same path. Same content, no navigation, no styling, no scripts. Links below point at other twins. Site map for machines: [llms.txt](../llms.txt). The whole dataset: [directory.json](../data/directory.json).* *Maintained by Andrew McGuire (https://andrewcmcguire.com), who also publishes https://gtmsignals.co and https://justsaid.ai.* --- [Directory](../index.md) / [Vendors](../vendors/index.md) / GetAccept # GetAccept 1 product in the directory 0 official MCP servers 0 live handshakes Data baked 2026-09-27 Vendor domain: [getaccept.com](https://getaccept.com) · vendor page id getaccept-com **The rollup** - **Products**: 1, facts checked by hand 2026-09-02 - **Official MCP servers**: 0 of 1, as recorded on 2026-09-02 - **Community MCP servers**: 0 of 1 - **Live handshake**: 0 of 1 answered an MCP initialize, 0 probed, no date - **Repo local**: 0 of 1: a server you install and run yourself - **Docs only**: 0 of 1: the recorded URL is a page about the server, not the server - **Tools catalogued**: not measured on any product of this vendor - **Bench tested**: 0 of 1 here, 1 of 1,252 across the directory - **Ships a CLI**: 0 of 1 official, 0 community only, 1 none found, harvested 2026-09-27 - **GitHub organisation**: [github.com/getaccept](https://github.com/getaccept), tied to the domain with evidence 2026-09-08 A live handshake means the URL answered an MCP initialize as a server on the probe date. It is liveness and nothing more: nobody has run its tools. A tool being catalogued means a server names it, by answering tools/list, in its own source, or in the vendor's documentation. None of them has been called. A tool count of 0 means not measured, never zero tools. **Products, 1** ### [GetAccept](../tools/getaccept.md) Digital sales room and e-signature platform combining proposal delivery, contract tracking, and an e-signature API for embedding signing flows into other products. [No MCP found](../mcp/none-found.md) · [Paid, self-serve](../gates/paid.md) [Proposals & Deals](../categories/proposals-deals.md) RESEARCHED - **Endpoint probe**: n/a, not probed - **Connect URL**: no connect URL recorded - **Tools catalogued**: not measured - **last_checked**: 2026-09-02 **The gates, in plain words** 1 of 1 paid and self serve, API access by paying, no sales call. The gate is the api_gate field on each product entry, established by hand on the last_checked date shown above. It records whether a solo operator can get API access without a contract. Money is not tracked. **Jobs the vendor says its products do** - [Generate a proposal or quote](../jobs/generate-proposal-or-quote.md) - [Send a document for signature](../jobs/send-document-for-signature.md) - [Create a digital sales room](../jobs/create-digital-sales-room.md) 3 distinct job labels, the union across 1 product, tagged 2026-08-25. A job tag means the vendor says the tool does this. It is not a test result, not proof the capability is reachable through the tool's MCP server, and not proof it is available on the gate this entry records. **Connect URLs** No product of this vendor records an MCP endpoint or docs URL that the probe could classify. **Command line** No CLI found for any product of this vendor by the 2026-09-27 harvest across vendor docs, npm, PyPI, Homebrew and GitHub. That is a probe result, not proof of absence. **On GitHub** [github.com/getaccept](https://github.com/getaccept) tied to the vendor by rule 3, account website https://getaccept.com has the vendor's domain, confidence strong - **Public repositories**: 5, forks excluded, as read on 2026-09-08 - **Mention MCP**: 0 of them - **Look like CLIs**: 0 of them - **Latest push**: 2026-06-23 The five most recently pushed, on 2026-09-08: | Repository | Kind | Description | Stars | Pushed | Latest release | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | [openapi](https://github.com/getaccept/openapi) | API client | | 6 | 2026-06-23 | | | [addon-getaccept-lime-doc](https://github.com/getaccept/addon-getaccept-lime-doc) | docs or examples | | 0 | 2026-02-11 | | | [limecrm](https://github.com/getaccept/limecrm) | other | | 0 | 2025-02-24 | 1.2.5 | | [notebooks](https://github.com/getaccept/notebooks) | other | Google Colab & Jupyter notebooks | 1 | 2024-10-01 | | | [hackathon-daebak](https://github.com/getaccept/hackathon-daebak) | other | Hackathon November 2019 | 0 | 2019-11-14 | | Kind is a heuristic guessed from the repository name, topics and description, not a fact the vendor stated. A repository count is activity, not a verdict. Read 2026-09-08. **What this page does not claim** A job tag is a vendor claim: it means the vendor says the product does this, and it is not a test result. A listed tool has not been run: the catalogue says what an agent could try, not what works. 1 of 1,252 directory entries are bench tested, meaning somebody personally ran the tool on a stated date, and 0 of this vendor's 1 product are among them. There is no verdict here on whether this vendor is better than another. Vendor pages group the directory's canonical product entries by vendor_domain. The vendor name is the product display name that matches the domain when several products share it; nothing on this page is typed by hand. Data baked 2026-09-27 by build_directory.py (phase 1).