The GTM MCP Directory
Directory / Signals & Intent / UserGems

UserGems

Official MCP Enterprise only Signals & Intent RESEARCHED Checked 2026-08-24
RESEARCHED Facts from public sources with URLs. No usage claims. Nobody has run this tool. The other tier is BENCH-TESTED, which means Andrew personally ran the tool on a stated date and cannot be bought at any price. Across the whole directory that count is 1.

Vendor: https://www.usergems.com · entry id 05-usergems · source 05-signals-intent-abm.md line 87

What it does
Tracks job changes of known contacts (past customers/champions moving to new companies) plus 30+ other native signals (new hires, promotions, funding, website visits, M&A) sourced from LinkedIn-style data providers and a customer's own CRM history, to surface warm outbound opportunities.
AI features, separated from automation with an AI label on it
Core job-change/hire tracking is rules-based data monitoring and matching, not ML. A newer "Research Agent" for open-ended custom signal discovery is the more genuinely AI-native piece (LLM-agent layer); be skeptical of "AI-powered" framing applied to the core product.
RevOps role
Champion/relationship-tracking layer triggering warm outbound when known contacts change jobs, feeding sales engagement tools and CRM.
MCP server
Status bucket
Official MCP
Auth
unknown - connects inside Claude/ChatGPT per the product page, but the exact auth mechanism (OAuth vs. API key) isn't disclosed publicly.
Parsed URLs
1 found in the mcp_url field
Endpoint probe
docs page, not an endpoint
Probed
2026-09-04, HTTP 200

The vendor ships and maintains the server itself. A wrapper built by Zapier, Composio or a similar third party does not count as official. The status was established by hand on 2026-08-24. On 2026-09-04 the recorded URL served a documentation page, not an MCP endpoint. That is where to read about the server, not where to connect to it. An agent needs the second.

mcp_status, verbatim from the file:

official

mcp_url, verbatim from the file:

https://www.usergems.com/product/mcp

What this server exposes

Not harvested yet. Unmeasured, not empty: nobody has read this server's tool list, so this page says nothing about what it exposes.

141 of the 741 entries that record an official or community MCP server carry a harvested tool list. The other 600 are unmeasured, which is not the same as empty. Harvest last run 2026-09-27. The full roll up is on the tools index.

Command line

No CLI found by the 2026-09-27 harvest across vendor docs, npm, PyPI, Homebrew and GitHub. That is a probe result, not proof of absence.

Access gate
Gate bucket
Enterprise only
Can a solo operator reach it
Not without a contract

api_gate, verbatim from the file:

enterprise-only

API documentation

No documentation URL recorded.

727 of 1252 entries are in the same position. Blank is legal and it is published as blank.

GitHub health

Not measured. github_url, github_stars, github_last_commit and github_archived are null on every entry in this build.

The refresh rail specced in SPEC section 7.2 has not been run. An unstamped star count is a lie, so nothing is shown rather than something stale.

On GitHub

github.com/usergems tied to the vendor by rule 3, account website https://www.usergems.com has the vendor's domain, confidence strong

Public repositories
0, forks excluded, as read on 2026-09-08
Mention MCP
0 of them
Look like CLIs
0 of them
Latest push
not recorded

Kind is a heuristic guessed from the repository name, topics and description, not a fact the vendor stated. A repository count is activity, not a verdict. Read 2026-09-08.

Jobs it can do

A job tag means the vendor says the tool does this. It is not a test result, not proof the capability is reachable through the tool's MCP server, and not proof it is available on the gate this entry records.

Tagged by machine-pass on 2026-08-25 against the closed 56 job vocabulary. 271 of 1,252 entries carry at least one tag; 849 tags are assigned in total.

Sources

5 source URLs. Raw sources field, verbatim:

https://www.usergems.com/product/mcp, https://www.usergems.com/, https://www.vendr.com/marketplace/usergems, https://www.keepsync.io/post/usergems-pricing-worth-30k-year-cheaper-alternatives, https://salesmotion.io/blog/usergems-pricing

Notes, verbatim from the file
No public pricing page - third-party trackers (Vendr, Keepsync, Salesmotion) report tiers from ~$33K/yr to ~$120K/yr plus a $3-10K implementation fee; treat as market-observed, not vendor-confirmed. No self-serve signup found.
Provenance
Entry id
05-usergems
Source file
05-signals-intent-abm.md
Source line
87
Tier
RESEARCHED
last_checked
2026-08-24
Data baked
2026-09-27

Every field above is rendered from directory.json exactly as the build produced it. Nothing is summarised and nothing is dropped. The one change made at render time is typographic and it is disclosed on the methodology page.