People Data Labs

A working server exists but somebody other than the vendor built it. It can be abandoned without the vendor noticing. The status was established by hand on 2026-08-24. On 2026-09-04 the recorded URL was a reachable repository or package: a server you install and run on your own machine over stdio. Callable after an install, not a remote endpoint.

mcp_status, verbatim from the file:

community

mcp_url, verbatim from the file:

https://github.com/phxdev1/peopledatalabs-mcp

• https://github.com/phxdev1/peopledatalabs-mcp

A tool below is one the server NAMES. Nobody has called it. That is the same two tier honesty rule the rest of the directory runs on: a named tool is research, and BENCH-TESTED stays the only claim that anybody ran anything.

This list came from a repo the vendor does not own. Those are that author's tools for the vendor's API, not the vendor's own published surface, and the two must not be read as the same thing.

• autocomplete
  Get autocomplete suggestions for a partial query
  evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
• bulk_person_enrich
  Enrich multiple person profiles in a single request
  evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
• enrich_company
  Enrich a company profile with additional data
  evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
• enrich_person
  Enrich a person profile with additional data from People Data Labs
  evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
• search_companies
  Search for companies matching specific criteria
  evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
• search_job_titles
  Search for job titles matching specific criteria
  evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
• search_locations
  Search for locations matching specific criteria
  evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
• search_people
  Search for people matching specific criteria
  evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
• search_schools
  Search for schools matching specific criteria
  evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
• search_skills
  Search for skills matching specific criteria
  evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface

141 of the 741 entries that record an official or community MCP server carry a harvested tool list. The other 600 are unmeasured, which is not the same as empty. Harvest last run 2026-09-27. Every name across every server is on the tools index.

No CLI found by the 2026-09-27 harvest across vendor docs, npm, PyPI, Homebrew and GitHub. That is a probe result, not proof of absence.

api_gate, verbatim from the file:

free

No documentation URL recorded.

727 of 1252 entries are in the same position. Blank is legal and it is published as blank.

Not measured. github_url, github_stars, github_last_commit and github_archived are null on every entry in this build.

The refresh rail specced in SPEC section 7.2 has not been run. An unstamped star count is a lie, so nothing is shown rather than something stale.

A github.com URL already appears somewhere in this entry, which is a seed for that rail and not a measurement of repo health:

• https://github.com/phxdev1/peopledatalabs-mcp

github.com/peopledatalabs tied to the vendor by rule 3, account website https://www.peopledatalabs.com has the vendor's domain, confidence strong

The five most recently pushed, on 2026-09-08:

Kind is a heuristic guessed from the repository name, topics and description, not a fact the vendor stated. A repository count is activity, not a verdict. Read 2026-09-08.

• Search people by criteria
• Search companies by firmographics
• Enrich a person from a LinkedIn URL
• Enrich a company from a domain
• Reverse-look-up a person from an email
• Find a person's LinkedIn URL from a name and company

A job tag means the vendor says the tool does this. It is not a test result, not proof the capability is reachable through the tool's MCP server, and not proof it is available on the gate this entry records.

Tagged by machine-pass on 2026-08-25 against the closed 56 job vocabulary. 271 of 1,252 entries carry at least one tag; 849 tags are assigned in total.

• https://support.peopledatalabs.com/hc/en-us/articles/25794271805211-Pricing-credits
• https://nubela.co/blog/people-data-labs-pricing/
• https://github.com/phxdev1/peopledatalabs-mcp
• https://glama.ai/mcp/servers/phxdev1/peopledatalabs-mcp
• https://saleshive.com/vendors/peopledatalabs

5 source URLs. Raw sources field, verbatim:

https://support.peopledatalabs.com/hc/en-us/articles/25794271805211-Pricing-credits, https://nubela.co/blog/people-data-labs-pricing/, https://github.com/phxdev1/peopledatalabs-mcp, https://glama.ai/mcp/servers/phxdev1/peopledatalabs-mcp, https://saleshive.com/vendors/peopledatalabs

Every field above is rendered from directory.json exactly as the build produced it. Nothing is summarised and nothing is dropped. The one change made at render time is typographic and it is disclosed on the methodology page.