Offorte

The vendor ships and maintains the server itself. A wrapper built by Zapier, Composio or a similar third party does not count as official. The status was established on 2026-09-07 and the MCP URL has not been probed live yet.

mcp_status, verbatim from the file:

official

mcp_url, verbatim from the file:

https://github.com/offorte/offorte-mcp-server (vendor pages: https://www.offorte.com/for-developers and https://www.offorte.com/en/blog/proposal-software/handsfree-proposal-sending-with-mcp)

• https://github.com/offorte/offorte-mcp-server
• https://www.offorte.com/for-developers
• https://www.offorte.com/en/blog/proposal-software/handsfree-proposal-sending-with-mcp

A tool below is one the server NAMES. Nobody has called it. That is the same two tier honesty rule the rest of the directory runs on: a named tool is research, and BENCH-TESTED stays the only claim that anybody ran anything.

• create_contact
  Create a new contact (organisation or person/individual)
  evidence: in the server source · calling it writes
• create_proposal
  Create a new proposal
  evidence: in the server source · calling it writes
• get_account_users
  Lists all account users for the current account
  evidence: in the server source · calling it reads
• get_automation_sets
  Lists automation sets which are used as an optional input to create a new proposal
  evidence: in the server source · calling it writes
• get_contact_details
  Get all details for a contact by id
  evidence: in the server source · calling it reads
• get_design_templates
  Lists available design templates which are used to create new proposals
  evidence: in the server source · calling it writes
• get_email_templates
  Lists available email templates which are used to send proposals
  evidence: in the server source · calling it writes
• get_initial_context
  IMPORTANT: This tool must be called before using any other tools. It will get usage instructions & Offorte context for this MCP server.
  evidence: in the server source · calling it reads
• get_proposal_directories
  Get all proposal directories grouped by status (edit, open, won, lost, closed)
  evidence: in the server source · calling it reads
• get_proposal_templates
  Lists proposal templates which are used as starting points to create new proposals
  evidence: in the server source · calling it writes
• get_text_templates
  Lists available language text templates which are used to create new proposals
  evidence: in the server source · calling it writes
• search_contact_organisations
  Search for organisations by name in the contacts
  evidence: in the server source · calling it reads
• search_contact_people
  Search for people by name in the contacts
  evidence: in the server source · calling it reads
• search_proposals
  Search for proposals by query
  evidence: in the server source · calling it reads
• send_proposal
  Send a proposal to its assigned contacts
  evidence: in the server source · calling it writes

141 of the 741 entries that record an official or community MCP server carry a harvested tool list. The other 600 are unmeasured, which is not the same as empty. Harvest last run 2026-09-27. Every name across every server is on the tools index.

No CLI found by the 2026-09-27 harvest across vendor docs, npm, PyPI, Homebrew and GitHub. That is a probe result, not proof of absence.

api_gate, verbatim from the file:

paid - the pricing page states "A technical API is available with which programmers can control Offorte via code" under the Premium plan (from EUR 49/month for 5 users, EUR 390/year), which also lists "Create & send proposals via API", webhooks and Zapier; the Standard plan (from EUR 12.50/month, 1 user) does not list API access.

No documentation URL recorded.

727 of 1252 entries are in the same position. Blank is legal and it is published as blank.

Not measured. github_url, github_stars, github_last_commit and github_archived are null on every entry in this build.

The refresh rail specced in SPEC section 7.2 has not been run. An unstamped star count is a lie, so nothing is shown rather than something stale.

A github.com URL already appears somewhere in this entry, which is a seed for that rail and not a measurement of repo health:

• https://github.com/offorte/offorte-mcp-server

github.com/offorte tied to the vendor by rule 1, account website https://www.offorte.com has the vendor's domain, confidence strong

The five most recently pushed, on 2026-09-08:

Kind is a heuristic guessed from the repository name, topics and description, not a fact the vendor stated. A repository count is activity, not a verdict. Read 2026-09-08.

No job tag on this entry.

981 of 1,252 entries are untagged. An empty list here means nobody has tagged this, not that the tool does nothing. The vocabulary is closed, so a tool whose job is genuinely not in it stays blank rather than being forced into the nearest tag.

• https://github.com/offorte/offorte-mcp-server
• https://www.offorte.com/en/pricing
• https://www.offorte.com/for-developers
• https://www.offorte.com/en/blog/proposal-software/handsfree-proposal-sending-with-mcp

4 source URLs. Raw sources field, verbatim:

https://github.com/offorte/offorte-mcp-server, https://www.offorte.com/en/pricing, https://www.offorte.com/for-developers, https://www.offorte.com/en/blog/proposal-software/handsfree-proposal-sending-with-mcp

Every field above is rendered from directory.json exactly as the build produced it. Nothing is summarised and nothing is dropped. The one change made at render time is typographic and it is disclosed on the methodology page.