The GTM MCP Directory
Directory / Video Prospecting / Loom

Loom

Community MCP Free to start Video Prospecting RESEARCHED Checked 2026-08-24
RESEARCHED Facts from public sources with URLs. No usage claims. Nobody has run this tool. The other tier is BENCH-TESTED, which means Andrew personally ran the tool on a stated date and cannot be bought at any price. Across the whole directory that count is 1.

Vendor: loom.com · entry id 08-loom · source 08-video-prospecting.md line 33

What it does
Async video-messaging platform; in its sales use case, reps record personalized video messages with name/company variables, track prospect views, and embed CTAs/booking links directly in the video.
AI features, separated from automation with an AI label on it
Vendor states (Business+AI / Enterprise tiers only) AI-generated titles/summaries/auto-chapters, automatic filler-word/silence removal, an AI-drafted follow-up email companion, and transcription/captioning in 50+ languages (base transcription ships even on the free tier; the AI enrichment layer is gated). Variable-based name/company personalization, view tracking, and CTA embedding are plain templating/automation, not AI, despite being marketed alongside the AI features. Vendor's own 18% engagement-lift claim not independently verified.
RevOps role
Lower-overhead async video touch for individual AEs/SDRs/CSMs - follow-ups and lightweight prospecting rather than a managed outbound-campaign engine.
MCP server
Status bucket
Community MCP
Auth
karbassi/mcp-loom uses Loom's undocumented internal GraphQL API via a browser session cookie (connect.sid) manually extracted from a logged-in session - no official API key exists for this per the project's own README.
Parsed URLs
3 found in the mcp_url field
Endpoint probe
repo or package: install and run locally
Probed
2026-09-04, HTTP 200

A working server exists but somebody other than the vendor built it. It can be abandoned without the vendor noticing. The status was established by hand on 2026-08-24. On 2026-09-04 the recorded URL was a reachable repository or package: a server you install and run on your own machine over stdio. Callable after an install, not a remote endpoint.

mcp_status, verbatim from the file:

community

mcp_url, verbatim from the file:

https://github.com/karbassi/mcp-loom (largest community implementation, ~58 tools against Loom's internal GraphQL API); smaller variants at https://github.com/m2ai-mcp-servers/loom-mcp and https://github.com/CaliLuke/loom-mcp

What this server exposes
Tools named
60
Strongest evidence
in the server source
Harvested
2026-09-27
Repo read
karbassi/mcp-loom
Whose repo
third-party
Catalogue shape
a fixed catalogue the vendor publishes

A tool below is one the server NAMES. Nobody has called it. That is the same two tier honesty rule the rest of the directory runs on: a named tool is research, and BENCH-TESTED stays the only claim that anybody ran anything.

This list came from a repo the vendor does not own. Those are that author's tools for the vendor's API, not the vendor's own published surface, and the two must not be read as the same thing.

  • add_comment_reaction
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • add_reaction
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • add_to_watch_later
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • approve_task
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • archive_videos
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • create_comment
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • create_folder
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • create_task
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • delete_comment
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • delete_folders
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • delete_reaction
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • delete_task
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • delete_video
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • duplicate_video
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • edit_comment
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_backlinks
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_captions
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_chapters
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_comment_reactions
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_comments
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_confluence_pages
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_description
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_download_url
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_folder
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_frequent_reactions
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_key_takeaways
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_last_watch_time
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_meeting_notes
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_reactions
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_space
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_summary
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_tags
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_tasks
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_total_videos_count
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_transcript
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_user
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_video
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_video_details
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • get_watch_later_count
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • list_folders
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • list_spaces
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • list_videos
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • move_folders
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • move_videos
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • pin_video
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • recover_video
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • regenerate_mp4
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • remove_from_watch_later
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • rename_folder
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • respond_to_task
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • search_folders
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • search_videos
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • search_workspace_tags
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • share_videos_to_spaces
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • toggle_following
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • toggle_following_tag
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • update_task
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • update_video_description
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • update_video_name
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface
  • update_video_settings
    No description was recorded with the name.
    evidence: in the server source · calling it reads · from a third party repo, so these are that author's tools, not the vendor's published surface

141 of the 741 entries that record an official or community MCP server carry a harvested tool list. The other 600 are unmeasured, which is not the same as empty. Harvest last run 2026-09-27. Every name across every server is on the tools index.

Command line

No CLI found by the 2026-09-27 harvest across vendor docs, npm, PyPI, Homebrew and GitHub. That is a probe result, not proof of absence.

Access gate
Gate bucket
Free to start
Can a solo operator reach it
Yes, without talking to anyone

api_gate, verbatim from the file:

free (recordSDK and embedSDK are self-serve via a developer-portal account and Loom's own dev site says start building with recordSDK today for free; this is a record/embed SDK rather than a general REST API and no SDK pricing tiers are published)

API documentation

No documentation URL recorded.

727 of 1252 entries are in the same position. Blank is legal and it is published as blank.

GitHub health

Not measured. github_url, github_stars, github_last_commit and github_archived are null on every entry in this build.

The refresh rail specced in SPEC section 7.2 has not been run. An unstamped star count is a lie, so nothing is shown rather than something stale.

A github.com URL already appears somewhere in this entry, which is a seed for that rail and not a measurement of repo health:

On GitHub

github.com/loomhq tied to the vendor by rule 3, account website https://www.loom.com has the vendor's domain, confidence strong

Public repositories
5, forks excluded, as read on 2026-09-08
Mention MCP
0 of them
Look like CLIs
1 of them
Latest push
2026-09-08

The five most recently pushed, on 2026-09-08:

RepositoryKindDescriptionStarsPushedLatest release
eks-ng-ami-updaterinfrastructureEKS NG AMI Updater is an open source project that can be used to update kubernetes node group images.282026-09-08
lock-execCLIA CLI tool for running any shell based commands in a distributed environment with DynamoDB locking.72026-09-04v2.3.0
datadog-exporterotherexport and backup datadog resource definitions locally12026-09-03v1.2.0
cmake-orbotherCircleCI Orb for CMake Installation and Caching02023-02-031.0.0
ElectronMacOSClickThroughotherAn Add On workaround for transparent window click through issues on electron v8 and above82021-04-16

Kind is a heuristic guessed from the repository name, topics and description, not a fact the vendor stated. A repository count is activity, not a verdict. Read 2026-09-08.

Jobs it can do

A job tag means the vendor says the tool does this. It is not a test result, not proof the capability is reachable through the tool's MCP server, and not proof it is available on the gate this entry records.

Tagged by machine-pass on 2026-08-25 against the closed 56 job vocabulary. 271 of 1,252 entries carry at least one tag; 849 tags are assigned in total.

Sources

6 source URLs. Raw sources field, verbatim:

https://www.loom.com/use-case/sales, https://www.loom.com/pricing, https://www.loom.com/sdk, https://github.com/karbassi/mcp-loom, https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/LOOM-690, https://dev.loom.com/

Notes, verbatim from the file
Loom's dominant real-world use case remains general screen-recording/async communication, not outbound sales specifically - this entry evaluates only the sales-messaging angle per research scope. Watch for name collisions: several "Loom MCP" search results (e.g. a PulseMCP listing, maxsloef/loom-mcp) belong to an unrelated text/prompt-exploration tool that also happens to be called "loom." [api_gate 2026-08-25] Reclassified unknown -> free from the vendor's own page (https://dev.loom.com/): recordSDK and embedSDK are self-serve via a developer-portal account and Loom's own dev site says start building with recordSDK today for free; this is a record/embed SDK rather than a general REST API and no SDK pricing tiers are published.
Provenance
Entry id
08-loom
Source file
08-video-prospecting.md
Source line
33
Tier
RESEARCHED
last_checked
2026-08-24
Data baked
2026-09-27

Every field above is rendered from directory.json exactly as the build produced it. Nothing is summarised and nothing is dropped. The one change made at render time is typographic and it is disclosed on the methodology page.