Klarix Intelligence Engine

A working server exists but somebody other than the vendor built it. It can be abandoned without the vendor noticing. The status was established on 2026-09-12 and the MCP URL has not been probed live yet.

mcp_status, verbatim from the file:

community

mcp_url, verbatim from the file:

https://mcp.klarix.ai/mcp

• https://mcp.klarix.ai/mcp

A tool below is one the server NAMES. Nobody has called it. That is the same two tier honesty rule the rest of the directory runs on: a named tool is research, and BENCH-TESTED stays the only claim that anybody ran anything.

• analyze_head_to_head
  Compare YOUR company against a specific competitor or incumbent you want to displace. Researches both sides on the live public web, then returns asymmetric advantages (where you win structurally), their defensive moats (where to stop arguin
  evidence: answered tools/list · calling it reads · required: target_domain
• detect_account_triggers
  Detect recent account inflection points (leadership changes, funding, hiring surges, product updates, regulatory events) within a timeframe.
  evidence: answered tools/list · calling it reads · required: target_domain
• find_matched_prospects
  Build a first-pass candidate list from hundreds of thousands of pre-profiled B2B companies using Voyage 4 semantic vector embeddings. Ranks accounts by topical similarity to an ICP description, tech stack, business model, and vertical, then
  evidence: answered tools/list · calling it reads · required: icp_or_query
• generate_displacement_playbook
  Generate an end-to-end competitive displacement playbook with switching cost mitigations, POC blueprints, and migration timelines.
  evidence: answered tools/list · calling it reads · required: target_domain
• generate_outreach_sequence
  Write cold outreach that opens on a researched, dated insight about the prospect rather than a pleasantry. Supports a 3-step email sequence, a 3-step LinkedIn sequence, or 6 multivariant openers. Enforces the Klarix voice contract (banned A
  evidence: answered tools/list · calling it writes · required: prospect_company, target_title, value_prop, channel
• generate_swot_analysis
  Deep multi-source web crawl into a four-quadrant SWOT matrix for a company: internal strengths (moat, proprietary tech, distribution lock) and weaknesses (pricing friction, customer complaints, legacy tech), plus external opportunities (unt
  evidence: answered tools/list · calling it reads · required: domain
• get_buying_committee
  Map the internal buying committee (Economic Buyer, Champion, Technical Evaluator, Procurement) for an account with title patterns, pain points, objections, and multi-threading strategy.
  evidence: answered tools/list · calling it reads · required: target_domain
• get_company_intelligence
  Synthesize an executive one-pager on a company from live public web sources: snapshot, findings per requested focus area, dated buying signals, deal risks, and stated unknowns. Every claim carries a source URL. Focus areas include pricing,
  evidence: answered tools/list · calling it reads · required: domain
• get_competitor_battlecard
  Build a live sales battlecard for a competitor domain: SWOT from their point of view, the gap between their marketing claims and buyer-reported reality, and concrete landmines with spoken talk tracks. Every claim cites a public source. Opti
  evidence: answered tools/list · calling it reads · required: competitor_domain
• get_deep_research
  Exhaustive intelligence probe on a company across five dimensions: firmographic and corporate evolution (funding, revenue tier, team growth), product and technology teardown (stack, API presence, core capabilities), leadership and organizat
  evidence: answered tools/list · calling it reads · required: domain
• get_market_landscape
  Map a competitive landscape for an industry or vertical from live public sources: Tier-1 incumbents against emerging disruptors, category positioning quadrants with the white space in each, published pricing models and price bands, and the
  evidence: answered tools/list · calling it reads · required: industry_or_vertical
• score_prospect_fit
  Score a company against your ICP on five weighted axes - Strategic Fit, Tech Alignment, Buyer Persona Readiness, Growth Triggers, and Landmine Risk - each 1-10, with a weighted overall and a 7+/10 pursue threshold. Uses live public web...
  evidence: answered tools/list · calling it reads · required: company_name, domain
• search_scientific_evidence
  Retrieve verifiable academic and engineering literature for a technical topic so a claim can cite a resolvable DOI instead of a vendor blog post. Queries Semantic Scholar (citation graph, abstracts, open-access PDFs) and the arXiv preprint
  evidence: answered tools/list · calling it reads · required: topic
• teardown_product_spec
  Deconstruct a physical hardware device, battery pack, medical system, or software API into an institutional-grade technical specification table with exact units, tolerances, verified images/diagrams, datasheet links, certifications, and dis
  evidence: answered tools/list · calling it reads · required: target_domain
• teardown_tech_stack
  Deconstruct an account's technical infrastructure, dev tools, cloud providers, AI/data stack, and identify displacement vulnerabilities.
  evidence: answered tools/list · calling it reads · required: target_domain

141 of the 741 entries that record an official or community MCP server carry a harvested tool list. The other 600 are unmeasured, which is not the same as empty. Harvest last run 2026-09-27. Every name across every server is on the tools index.

No CLI found by the 2026-09-27 harvest across vendor docs, npm, PyPI, Homebrew and GitHub. That is a probe result, not proof of absence.

api_gate, verbatim from the file:

unknown

949 of 1252 entries carry an unknown gate. Unknown is a legal answer and it ships as unknown rather than as a guess.

No documentation URL recorded.

727 of 1252 entries are in the same position. Blank is legal and it is published as blank.

Not measured. github_url, github_stars, github_last_commit and github_archived are null on every entry in this build.

The refresh rail specced in SPEC section 7.2 has not been run. An unstamped star count is a lie, so nothing is shown rather than something stale.

No GitHub organisation could be tied to mcp.klarix.ai with evidence on 2026-09-15.

Recorded by the harvest: not checked: gh CLI missing or not logged in.

No job tag on this entry.

981 of 1,252 entries are untagged. An empty list here means nobody has tagged this, not that the tool does nothing. The vocabulary is closed, so a tool whose job is genuinely not in it stays blank rather than being forced into the nearest tag.

• https://mcp.klarix.ai/mcp

1 source URL. Thin. The standing rule is at least two independent sources with the vendor's own site unable to be both of them, and this entry does not meet it. 100 entries are in the same state and they are listed on the methodology page. Raw sources field, verbatim:

https://mcp.klarix.ai/mcp

Every field above is rendered from directory.json exactly as the build produced it. Nothing is summarised and nothing is dropped. The one change made at render time is typographic and it is disclosed on the methodology page.