The GTM MCP Directory
Directory / Signals & Intent / Champify

Champify

No MCP found Enterprise only Signals & Intent RESEARCHED Checked 2026-09-02
RESEARCHED Facts from public sources with URLs. No usage claims. Nobody has run this tool. The other tier is BENCH-TESTED, which means Andrew personally ran the tool on a stated date and cannot be bought at any price. Across the whole directory that count is 1.

Vendor: https://www.champify.io · entry id 05-champify · source 05-signals-intent-abm.md line 111

What it does
Tracks job changes of a company's past customers and champions as they move to new roles/companies, and flags closed-lost opportunities for re-engagement, integrated directly into Salesforce.
AI features, separated from automation with an AI label on it
"Insider AI" is marketed as synthesizing call transcripts, emails, and CRM data to recommend who/when/how to re-engage - plausible LLM synthesis, but no methodology is disclosed publicly, so treat as an unverified vendor claim. The core job-change detection itself is plain matching, not ML.
RevOps role
Champion-tracking / warm-outbound trigger tool, a near-direct competitor to UserGems with the same product shape.
MCP server
Status bucket
No MCP found
Auth
n/a
Parsed URLs
0 found in the mcp_url field

No server was found at the time of the check. That is a statement about the search, not a promise that none exists. The status was established on 2026-09-02.

mcp_status, verbatim from the file:

none-found

mcp_url, verbatim from the file:

none

Command line

No CLI found by the 2026-09-27 harvest across vendor docs, npm, PyPI, Homebrew and GitHub. That is a probe result, not proof of absence.

Access gate
Gate bucket
Enterprise only
Can a solo operator reach it
Not without a contract

api_gate, verbatim from the file:

enterprise-only

API documentation

No documentation URL recorded.

727 of 1252 entries are in the same position. Blank is legal and it is published as blank.

GitHub health

Not measured. github_url, github_stars, github_last_commit and github_archived are null on every entry in this build.

The refresh rail specced in SPEC section 7.2 has not been run. An unstamped star count is a lie, so nothing is shown rather than something stale.

On GitHub

github.com/champifyio tied to the vendor by rule 3, account website https://champify.io has the vendor's domain, confidence strong

Public repositories
1, forks excluded, as read on 2026-09-08
Mention MCP
0 of them
Look like CLIs
0 of them
Latest push
2024-11-22

The five most recently pushed, on 2026-09-08:

RepositoryKindDescriptionStarsPushedLatest release
envother12024-11-22

Kind is a heuristic guessed from the repository name, topics and description, not a fact the vendor stated. A repository count is activity, not a verdict. Read 2026-09-08.

Jobs it can do

A job tag means the vendor says the tool does this. It is not a test result, not proof the capability is reachable through the tool's MCP server, and not proof it is available on the gate this entry records.

Tagged by machine-pass on 2026-08-25 against the closed 56 job vocabulary. 271 of 1,252 entries carry at least one tag; 849 tags are assigned in total.

Sources

5 source URLs. Raw sources field, verbatim:

https://www.champify.io/pricing, https://www.champify.io/, https://www.trustradius.com/products/champify/pricing, https://prospectingmanual.com/ai-automation/compare/usergems-vs-champify/, https://www.vendr.com/buyer-guides/champify

Notes, verbatim from the file
Searched GitHub, mcp.so, glama.ai, pulsemcp.com - no MCP found. Published tiers $2,000-$6,000/mo (annual contracts standard); no self-serve signup, pricing page only offers "Get Demo"/"Request Data Test." Vendr reports median actual spend of $15,750/yr (n=11), below list price. 2026-09-02: re-checked champify.io/llms.txt (404) and web search; no MCP server found.
Provenance
Entry id
05-champify
Source file
05-signals-intent-abm.md
Source line
111
Tier
RESEARCHED
last_checked
2026-09-02
Data baked
2026-09-27

Every field above is rendered from directory.json exactly as the build produced it. Nothing is summarised and nothing is dropped. The one change made at render time is typographic and it is disclosed on the methodology page.