The GTM MCP Directory
Directory / Data & Enrichment / BetterContact

BetterContact

No MCP found Free to start Data & Enrichment RESEARCHED Checked 2026-09-03
RESEARCHED Facts from public sources with URLs. No usage claims. Nobody has run this tool. The other tier is BENCH-TESTED, which means Andrew personally ran the tool on a stated date and cannot be bought at any price. Across the whole directory that count is 1.

Vendor: bettercontact.rocks · entry id 01-bettercontact · source 01-data-enrichment.md line 274

What it does
A waterfall enrichment orchestrator that queries 20+ third-party email/phone data providers in sequence for a given contact, stopping once a verified match is found, rather than sourcing its own proprietary contact data.
AI features, separated from automation with an AI label on it
Vendor markets a "BetterAI algorithm" that decides the optimal order to query the 20+ underlying providers for a given contact - this is a sequencing/routing heuristic layered on top of other vendors' data, not a source of new contact data itself. The actual email/phone lookups still come from third-party providers via a 4-layer verification pass; call the "AI" label a thin optimization layer over automation, not a core AI product.
RevOps role
A meta-layer/orchestrator that sits above single-provider tools (Prospeo, Findymail, Dropcontact) in a RevOps stack, chaining them together to raise overall match rate rather than replacing them; commonly plugged into Clay, Make, or Zapier workflows.
MCP server
Status bucket
No MCP found
Auth
not recorded
Parsed URLs
0 found in the mcp_url field

No server was found at the time of the check. That is a statement about the search, not a promise that none exists. The status was established on 2026-09-03.

mcp_status, verbatim from the file:

none-found

The mcp_url field is empty on this entry. 417 of 1252 entries are.

Command line

No CLI found by the 2026-09-27 harvest across vendor docs, npm, PyPI, Homebrew and GitHub. That is a probe result, not proof of absence.

Access gate
Gate bucket
Free to start
Can a solo operator reach it
Yes, without talking to anyone

api_gate, verbatim from the file:

free

API documentation

No documentation URL recorded.

727 of 1252 entries are in the same position. Blank is legal and it is published as blank.

GitHub health

Not measured. github_url, github_stars, github_last_commit and github_archived are null on every entry in this build.

The refresh rail specced in SPEC section 7.2 has not been run. An unstamped star count is a lie, so nothing is shown rather than something stale.

On GitHub

github.com/bettercontactorg tied to the vendor by rule 3, account website bettercontact.rocks has the vendor's domain, confidence strong

Public repositories
1, forks excluded, as read on 2026-09-08
Mention MCP
0 of them
Look like CLIs
0 of them
Latest push
2026-08-19

The five most recently pushed, on 2026-09-08:

RepositoryKindDescriptionStarsPushedLatest release
docsdocs or examples02026-08-19

Kind is a heuristic guessed from the repository name, topics and description, not a fact the vendor stated. A repository count is activity, not a verdict. Read 2026-09-08.

Jobs it can do

A job tag means the vendor says the tool does this. It is not a test result, not proof the capability is reachable through the tool's MCP server, and not proof it is available on the gate this entry records.

Tagged by machine-pass on 2026-08-25 against the closed 56 job vocabulary. 271 of 1,252 entries carry at least one tag; 849 tags are assigned in total.

Sources

7 source URLs. Raw sources field, verbatim:

https://composio.dev/toolkits/bettercontact, https://bettercontact.rocks/pricing/, https://bettercontact.rocks/, https://doc.bettercontact.rocks/quickstart, https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/11/26/3195350/0/en/AI-Powered-Waterfall-Enrichment-Platform-BetterContact-Announces-Partnership-with-Clay-for-Berlin-GTM-Community-Event.html, https://doc.bettercontact.rocks/api-reference/endpoint/create, https://doc.bettercontact.rocks/api-reference/endpoint/get

Notes, verbatim from the file
No genuine MCP server found despite checking bettercontact.rocks, kb.bettercontact.rocks, and doc.bettercontact.rocks directly - none mention MCP. A GitHub repo ("upivi982/bettercontact") surfaced in search but is an unaffiliated affiliate-marketing README (tracked referral links, no actual code) - not a real MCP server, not counted. BetterContact also appears only via Composio's generic multi-app connector, not counted per the same standard applied to Datagma. BetterContact announced a Clay partnership/co-hosted event (Nov 2025) and is positioned as Clay-compatible. Pricing is self-serve from a 50-credit free trial (no card) and a $15/mo Starter tier (200 credits) with API included; "use your own API keys" is a $199 add-on specifically on the Starter tier (included free at Enterprise, $799/mo+). 2026-09-02: re-checked bettercontact.rocks/llms.txt (present, no MCP mention) and web search; only the Composio aggregator listing surfaces, no MCP server found. 2026-09-03: vendor docs state the enrichment endpoint (POST /async) takes first_name, last_name and company or company_domain per lead (https://doc.bettercontact.rocks/api-reference/endpoint/create) and the results response carries contact_linkedin_profile_url with a linkedin.com/in/ example (https://doc.bettercontact.rocks/api-reference/endpoint/get); the docs also say enrich_profile requires linkedin_url; no unit price is stated there.
Provenance
Entry id
01-bettercontact
Source file
01-data-enrichment.md
Source line
274
Tier
RESEARCHED
last_checked
2026-09-03
Data baked
2026-09-27

Every field above is rendered from directory.json exactly as the build produced it. Nothing is summarised and nothing is dropped. The one change made at render time is typographic and it is disclosed on the methodology page.